New Moon posters
男人不壞，女人不愛?
男人不壞，女人不愛? 這句話是梁家權在他星島的專欄內問的。(題目是:蔡子強不壞) 男人不壞，是不是就沒有女人愛? 作為女人的我可以告訴KK (家權的英文名): 當然不是! 不壞的男人有人愛，只有心胸X窄的男人沒人愛! 所以，KK說的那位講師沒人愛，不是他壞，而是他小家氣。 那位講師曾經是我的朋友。(留意: 是曾經) 什麼時候不再是朋友? 就是當我在英國回來後一次跟他見面時交談，他一面傲慢，半隻眼沒有看過我，然後跟我說: (大概內容，因為大部份的我已經忘記) 如果你還想做記者，就踏踏實實地做吧! 我當時一頭霧水: 難道這些年來，東奔西跑還不是踏實? 然後他又在我面前眩耀一下自己作為 (最有前途)講師，人工如何豐厚 (不過是幾萬元而已) ，福利如何好…原本想老朋友一年不見，聚聚舊，結果被人噴到一臉屁，非常無癮。 我自覺無癮也吧了，不見就是了! 可是這位講師在人前人後，甚至在他的專欄內久不久就抽我水，說對我是大哥哥看待小妹一樣，看見我這樣很心痛! 心痛? 我做十惡不赦的事嗎? 簡單說: 他說我作為記者去社交場合是不對! 我年資有限而出書是我不對! 問了一個TOO SIMPLE的問題而被人關注都是我不對! 很多學界和政界朋友看到他的大大小小專欄後走來問我: 為什麼講師總是咬着你不放? 我苦笑。總之以後對他我就避之則吉。 哼! 就算真是十惡不赦，自甘墮落，本人上有高堂下有兄弟，要痛心疾首，還淪不到他的份兒! 何況是我根本沒有。 KK呀KK，所以你真是寫錯了! 難道你沒聽過 :可憐之人必有可恨之處嗎? 男人，好的壞的都會有人愛，就是除了是小家敗氣的一種。
Comments
爭名利的一個人。
第一，一句「欽點董建華做特首」就給妳演活了「國王的新衣」裡面小孩子的角式，但惹來江主席怒罵一句「Too simple，sometimes naive」。轟動中、港、台。我們目睹一顆新彗星的誕生。在一些擦鞋仔眼中妳的缺點是否太坦白呢﹖
第二，最近看報知道無線有意聘請妳和張慧慈
主持「東張西望」，但遭妳婉拒。眾所周知，無線有慣性收視，是竄紅的好機會。
無論如何，You are great!
the way you've forced and anticipated him to answer, "yes, i support 董" and then draw your "欽點" implication is really not a very sophisitcated thing to do. it reminded me of high-school debates. the old man knew and understand clearly what you are trying to do and get pixxed off. i think partly because of his pride being ripped, but also partly because he enjoyed and proud playing games with the western media but felt 吹脹 with hk media. (sorry about the wording)
do not get me wrong, i've always respected and admired you professionally since you were one of the most ambitious and industrious reporter i've ever seen on tv screen. but i think one could always dig out sth to learn from even most terrible experience. and i bet you did.
may be i am 班門弄斧, but i'd rather ask, "do you currently see not better candidate other than 董?"... he may still need to answer "yes" or maybe he could come up with a wonderful answer, anyway, you would not need to draw the 欽點 implication yourself. it could be a better show to the smart audience in front of tv, i don't know.
well, but then it wouldn't be as interesting and dramatic as a "too simple, sometimes naive" story.